Skip to content

Field guide

AI architecture for finance

Retrieval, agents and evaluation, designed around the constraints finance imposes.

All insights

A finance-AI system is not a model with a prompt in front of it. It is a set of decisions about where retrieval ends and generation begins, how much autonomy an agent gets, what every call costs, and how a person checks the answer before it reaches a client or a regulator.

This guide collects how we think about that architecture: hybrid retrieval over financial documents, where agentic autonomy earns its keep and where it does not, and the evaluation that tells you whether any of it is good enough to ship.

RAG for financial documentsagentic AI financeLLM evaluationhybrid retrievalhuman-in-the-loop AI

Current signals

As of June 2026
  • Agent stacks now treat tools as governed APIs, with authorization, rate limits and action validation before anything executes.
  • Hybrid retrieval is the baseline; GraphRAG is used where entity relationships matter more than semantic similarity.
  • Evaluation-first is standard: teams test full trajectories, tool choice, latency, cost and security in CI and production, not one-off demos.
  • Deterministic code still owns arithmetic and transactions; model calls are reserved for reasoning, retrieval and classification.

In this guide

#architecture

When the document is the attacker: securing RAG in finance

Retrieval pulls semi-trusted filings and emails straight into the prompt. Here is how we treat that content as untrusted and build a layered defence for finance AI.

Read
#inference

Batch or real-time? Inference patterns for finance AI

Not every score needs to be computed at request time. Here is how we split batch precompute from real-time inference to hit cost and latency targets.

#function-calling

Making function calling reliable in finance workflows

A model that calls the wrong tool with the wrong arguments is a production incident. Here is how we make function calling dependable in finance systems.

#llm-gateway

An LLM gateway for access, cost and governance

Ungoverned model access is a cost and compliance leak. Here is the gateway we put in front of providers for keys, quotas, logging and policy.

#rag

Long context or retrieval? Choosing for finance documents

Bigger context windows do not retire retrieval. Here is how we decide between stuffing the context and retrieving, for filings, contracts and statements.

#small-models

Where small language models beat frontier models in finance

Not every finance task needs a frontier model. Here is where a fine-tuned small model wins on cost, latency and control, and where it does not.

#evaluation

Eval-driven development for finance AI

Write the eval before the feature. Here is how we run finance AI like test-driven development, with a scored eval set gating every change.

#caching

Caching strategies for LLM systems in finance

The cheapest model call is the one you do not make. Here are the prompt, semantic and result caches we use to cut finance LLM cost and latency safely.

#agentic

Governing agent tool use in finance workflows

An agent that can call tools can move money. Here is the authorization, rate-limiting and action-validation layer we require before an agent touches a finance system.

#hosting

On-prem, VPC or API: hosting AI in regulated finance

Where the model runs is a compliance decision as much as a technical one. Here is how we weigh API, VPC and self-hosted models for regulated finance data.

#multi-agent

Multi-agent orchestration in finance, and when to avoid it

One capable agent beats a swarm more often than the demos suggest. Here is where we split work across agents in a finance system and where a single loop is safer.

#architecture

Reranking: the retrieval step most finance RAG skips

First-pass retrieval returns plausible passages; reranking returns the right one. Here is how we add a reranker to finance RAG without blowing the latency budget.

#architecture

A reference architecture for finance AI systems

The same shape recurs across finance AI builds. Here is the reference architecture we start from: data layer, retrieval, model, guardrails, human review and audit.

#routing

Model routing and fallback for cost and reliability

One model for every call wastes money and breaks under load. Here is the routing, cascade and fallback design we use across a finance workload.

#validation

Output validation patterns for finance AI

A confident wrong answer is the failure mode that matters. Here are the schema, constraint and verification layers we put between a model and a finance workflow.

#architecture

Where agentic AI belongs in finance, and where it does not

Agentic AI is spreading fast across finance teams. The useful question is not whether to adopt it, but which decisions you let an agent make alone and which a person signs.

#observability

LLM observability and tracing for finance workloads

You cannot debug what you cannot see. Here is the tracing, logging and evaluation-in-production setup we use to keep a finance LLM system diagnosable.

#architecture

Building a RAG evaluation harness for finance

Vibes are not an eval. Here is the retrieval + generation test harness we stand up so a finance RAG system has a number that moves before it ships.

#roi

Measuring AI ROI in finance operations: the metrics CFOs accept

Hours saved is not a business case. Here are the payback, quality and risk metrics we use to prove a finance-ops AI system earns its keep in production.

#architecture

Hybrid retrieval for filings, transcripts and analyst reports

Pure vector search loses the exact tickers and defined terms that financial answers hinge on. Here is how we build hybrid RAG that an analyst can trace back to the source line.

#architecture

Build vs buy for finance-ops AI: a decision framework and TCO model

Point tool, platform or engineering-led build? Here is the framework we give finance and risk leaders to decide, including the total-cost and control trade-offs.

#architecture

Choosing a model for finance workloads, starting from the task

A leaderboard cannot tell you which model fits your finance workload. The task and an eval set can. Here is how we pick, and what the tradeoffs actually cost.

#architecture

Turning "it looks good" into a number before a finance AI system ships

A finance AI system needs a defensible accuracy number before it goes live. Here is the eval set we build, the baseline we hold it to, and why audit cares.

#architecture

Controlling LLM cost when finance asks per-query

An LLM bill that looks fine in aggregate hides where the money goes. Here is how we keep per-query cost low enough to survive a CFO's questions.

#architecture

Making LLM output safe to feed a finance system

A free-text number from a model should never flow straight into a ledger. Here is the method we use to make LLM output reliable enough to act on.

Working on something similar?

Tell us about your data and the workflow around it, and we will give you a straight read.

Book a 30-min intro call